El senador del Partido Popular, Fernando de Rosa


Fernando de Rosa said that "it is a shameful pardon and it is clear that they will meet in front of the Popular Party"

The spokesman for Justice of the Popular Group in the Senate, Fernando de Rosa, has accused the Minister of Justice of covering up a pardon with the reform of the Criminal Code. “It conceals a pardon to its investor partners, condemned by the attempted coup d'etat, with the reform of the Criminal Code that the Government intends to carry out. It is a shameful pardon and it is evident that they will find themselves in front of the Popular Party, ”he said.

De Rosa has pronounced like this in the Plenary of the Senate, during an interpellation to the Minister of Justice, Juan Carlos Campo, in which the popular spokesman has reiterated that “the modification of the constitutional order, without respecting the Rule of Law, deserves the greatest criminal reproaches. ”

Similarly, the Valencian senator has lamented that the Government of PSOE and Podemos, “wants to transfer to Parliament the payment of tolls for support for the investiture of Sanchez. "The Criminal Code cannot function as a file to cut the bars of the Lledoners prison," he added flatly.

"REFORM AD JUNQUERAS, AD GOLPISTAS-DELINCUENTES"

Throughout his intervention in his interpellation, Fernando de Rosa says that it is “an ad hominen reform, it is an ad junqueras reform, an ad coup-criminal reform”; and also for Bildu, who wants to collect his debt for contributing to the investiture. Are they also going to reform some other article of the Criminal Code to satisfy them? ” Fernando De Rosa has affirmed.

“The proof of the pact is that they are already looking the other way, given the measures of penitentiary benefits agreed by the Generalitat; for those who are already in a semi-freedom regime, Forcadell, Forn and 'Los Jordis', although they have claimed that they will do it again, contravening the provisions of art 100.1 of the penitentiary law ”, has remarked Fernando de Rosa.

The spokesman of Justice of the Popular Group began its intervention comparing the European legislation on sedition with the Spanish one, to demonstrate that Vice President Carmen Calvo “is wrong to affirm that the criminal rates in Spanish are not up to Europe” and that he himself Minister said that the criminal figures of sedition and rebellion are typical of the nineteenth century, when attacked with tanks.

"Modern rebellion or sedition will not occur with physical force, but with technology, as we have seen in the 1st," said De Rosa. And it has been asked that if “it is intended to reduce the penalties, it will have to explain why and why, because there is no explanation based on the comparative law” so it concludes that “the motive is political”.

Similarly, the senator of the PP has asked the minister “who rules in his Ministry”, because, he recalled, we have seen how this reform was announced by Carmen Calvo, Irene Montero announced the reform of sexual crimes, Adriana Lastra did it with the crime of apology; Pablo Iglesias spoke about the humiliation of the Supreme Court for European Justice and Alberto Garzón declares the exclusion of the Fiscal Ministry from the Judiciary.

IF WHAT THEY WANT IS TO INDULTATE, THEY ASSUME THE POLITICAL COST

Throughout his speech, the spokesperson of Justica of the popular has questioned the minister and asked him to “be brave, and if what you really want is to pardon these people, assume the political cost of approving a pardon for the attempted coup d'etat ”.

"Be brave and explain to society, if they can, what reasons of justice or fairness they appreciate in order to pardon these people who do not show repentance and who boast of repeating that they will try again," Fernando de Apostille added. Pink.

Finally, de Rosa has assured that this Government “lacks courage to assume the political cost of pardoning them, lacks courage to also assume the judicial cost that would imply, where appropriate, that the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the Supreme Court could review that decision of pardon. ”




Source of new